APPROVED

October 24, 2006

 

 

Brookline School Board

CDSA

September 26, 2006

 

Dave Partridge, Chair

Mike Dreyer

Wanda Meagher

Beth Lukovits

Tom Solon

 

Richard Pike, Superintendent of Schools

Robert Kelley, Director of Special Education

Patty Montague, Special Education Coordinator

Carol Mace, Director of Curriculum

Mellinee Capasso, Business Administrator

Dr. Anthony Luzzetti, Principal RMMS

Lorraine Wenger, Principal CSDA

Kevin Stone, Assistant Principal

Mary Kay MacFarlane, Recording Secretary

 

Dave Partridge called the meeting called to order at 6:40 pm, following the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

Open Forum

 

No items

 

Minutes

 

A motion was made to accept the minutes of August 16th by Beth Lukovits.  Mike Dreyer seconded the motion.  The motion carried by a vote 5 yes, 0 no.

 

Special Education Coordinator Report

 

The report was given by Patty Montague.  She started on July 6th.  Responsibilities are shared between RMMS, CSDA, preschool and out of district children.  She had a joint staff meeting at the end of August and discussed goals.  She is trying to be proactive with the problems that have occurred in the district.  She helped hire Para professionals.  Team meetings 5-6 at CSDA and 12 at RMMS, as well as, preschool and out of district.  A reading tutor was hired over the summer and she has been working with them.  She is continuing her education at Rivier, taking a law course soon.  She is pleased to be here and everyone has been wonderful.

 

 

 

 

Business Administrator’s Report

 

Budget:

RMMS            01-2600-624-01-00   ($1838)

                        Actual FY06 - $34046 Budget FY07 - $39000      FY07 - $40838                            

- CSDA           01-2600-624-02-00    ($6242)

                        Actual FY06 - $24049 Budget FY07 - $25000      FY07 - $31242

 

 

On the Horizon:

 

Director of Curriculum and Instruction Report

 

Carol Mace gave the Curriculum and Instruction Report.

 

NWEA

Ø      Three planning meetings

·        July                        Brookline - exploration of options, raised questions

Outcome - take time to gather information, implement in spring with one pilot grade at each school

·        August                    Brookline and Hollis – information gathering with Milford                                         Assistant Superintendent Laurie Johnson

·        September NWEA presentation to SAU 41 Leadership Team

                                   

Ø      Next steps

 

·        October 6th                        Milford visitation to observe training

·        November 15th                   NHSAA workshop with NH users of NWEA –

                                                lessons learned

·        November                          Finalize 2006-2007 Pilot Plan

·        February/March                 Teacher training on early dismissal day

·        April/May                           Testing (pilot classes – one grade at each school)

 

Ø      Budget considerations – Preliminary (subject to change)

2006-2007

·        Cost                                   $13.50/student (200 students) = $2,700

plus $3,550 (possibly shared with Hollis)

                                                            Total $6,250 first year cost

·        Source                               Testing Account

 

2007-2008

·        October                 Conceptual overview presented

·        November              Baseline budget presented

                                                ($10,300 Place-holder)

 

Mike Dreyer asked how much time it takes to take the test and does it follow our curriculum?  The test takes 45 minutes each and it is aligned with our curriculum.

 

Dave Partridge asked if we get the data so that if we don’t like the prepackaged report, that we can generate our own report.  Carol Mace will look into that.

 

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Ø      Recap

·        AYP required by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and determined by performance on New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP)     

·        Three factors

ü      Participation rates (95%)

ü      Performance of school/district as a whole

ü      Performance of subgroups (ethnicity, socio-economic status, special needs, English Language Learners)

·        Must meet performance targets

ü      2006 Reading target                 82% must score proficient or above

ü      2006 Mathematics target          76% must score proficient or above

ü      Performance targets increase each year until all students must reach proficiency to establish AYP (2013 – 2014)

 

Ø      Initial reports released in June and revised reports released in August

·        Brookline Schools made AYP in all categories

·        Brookline School District made AYP when the 2% rule* was applied to the Special Education subgroup in reading

·        Full reports are available at www.ed.state.nh.us/education/AYP06-07.htm

 

Ø      *2% adjustment for Special Education

·        Applies only to schools or districts that would not make AYP based on the scores of the special ed subgroup

·        Developed by the US Department of Education

·        Acknowledgement that 2% of students will not be proficient because of learning disabilities or physical or mental handicaps

·        Mathematical adjustment allowed until alternative test and academic standards are established for these students

·        More information and actual calculations can be found on the NHDOE website (see above)

           

 

Principal’s Report

 

Lorraine Wenger gave the report for CSDA.

 

Calendar

 

Overview

RMMS & CSDA

·        Opening Day – Smooth transition of Grade 4

·        Open House – well attended; positive feedback

·        Enrollment:

o       RMMS            K-77                Total-344

1-70

2-103

3-94

 

o       CSDA              4-89                 Total-277

5-99

6-89

October Preview

 

Superintendent’s Report

 

 

The Board took a 15 minute recess.

 

Gary Deitz is concerned about past and present.  He has not been able to get answers to all of his questions.  He is very upset about the past handling of his son’s education plan.  He urges the Board to be due diligent with parent complaints in the future and he is encouraged by the staff changes.

 

The Board had lengthy discussions with several members of the audience regarding special education issues.

 

Dave Partridge encouraged any parent with concerns to follow the chain of command until they get their questions answered. 

 

The Board requested that a memo go out to the parents informing them on how to find out answers regarding Special Education and who do they take their questions to first.

 

A motion was made by Mike Dreyer to have the Brookline School District Administration provide documentation to parents of students identifying processes and pathways available for troubleshooting and/or understanding educational process issues no later than October 31, 2006.  The draft is to be provided to the Board prior to distribution to the public.  The motion was seconded by Beth Lukovits.  The motion carried by a vote of 5 yes, 0 no.

 

Policy JLCF – Wellness Policy, First Reading

 

It is the policy of the Brookline School Board that a comprehensive school-based Wellness Program be established and reviewed annually.

 

In addition, the Brookline School Board recognizes the importance of appropriate daily physical activity and exercise as a way of minimizing certain childhood health problems.

 

Toward that end, the District will involve students, parents, staff, administration and community leaders in assessing the school’s nutrition and physical activity environment, and will recommend an appropriate program that will enable all students to take advantage of proper nutrition and daily physical activity.

 

Mike Dreyer makes a motion to accept policy JLCF as a first reading.  Beth Lukovits seconded the motion.  The motion carried by a vote of 5 yes, 0 no.

 

Committee Updates

 

Educational Specifications

 

Superintendent Evaluations

 

 

 

Insurance Committee

 

DOE Update

 

Dave Partridge read the following press release.

 

Recently, the Press reported on a civil suit brought in the United States District Court against the Brookline School District.  It is the policy of the District not to discuss or release the educational records or personally identifiable information of any student, without prior written consent from parents.  The District is committed to this policy, and therefore, cannot discuss the specifics of any adversarial proceedings involving students or student issues.  It is also the policy of the District not to comment on pending litigation.

           

            The District acts in accordance with its policy to provide all children within the District with a free and appropriate education at public expense.  The New Hampshire Department of Education periodically schedules independent on-site reviews for all school districts located within the State, and every district must undergo an on-site review at least once every five years.  Past independent onsite reviews have affirmed that the District offers an appropriate education to its students and the DOE scheduled the next review, currently ongoing, at the maximum interval of five years..  The District has no reason to believe that the result of this review will be any different.

 

            The District also takes measures to pro-actively improve the quality of its special education services.  In April of 2006 two individuals filed 32 complaints with over 250 allegations regarding the provision of special education in the Brookline School District.  The District answered each complaint in painstaking detail and also undertook two voluntary steps to further improve the quality and documentation of its special education services.  This constituted the complete resolution of the case and the DOE has now closed the investigation.  

 

            The District makes educational decisions with parents as part of the educational team.  Disagreements are usually resolved through discussion and consensus.  However, when parents and educators disagree over the appropriate special education for a child, and are unable to resolve their differences, the State Department of Education resolves the disagreement through an impartial due process hearing.  Those disagreements have been consistently resolved by impartial hearing officers in favor of the District.

 

            The State Department of Education maintains redacted copies of due process decisions.  These documents are part of the public record, and some of the decisions are available online, at:

 

http://www.ed.state.nh.us/education/laws/SpecialEducationandDueProcessHearingsandAlternativeDisputeResolution.htm

 

            The District is committed to providing all children with a free and appropriate public education and will continue to do so.

 

A motion to adjourn was made by Tom Solon.  The motion was seconded by Beth Lukovits.  The motion carried by unanimous vote 5 yes, 0 no.

10:25 pm

 

 

Date __________________________      Signed       ________________________